International Journal of Chemotherapy Research and Practice

International Journal of Chemotherapy Research and Practice

International Journal of Chemotherapy Research and Practice – Reviewer Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Reviewer Guidance

Reviewer Guidelines

Standards for constructive and ethical peer review

Reviewers play a critical role in maintaining IJCP quality. These guidelines outline expectations for timely, objective, and constructive reviews.

Reviews should focus on methodological rigor, clarity of reporting, and relevance to chemotherapy research and clinical care.

Thoughtful reviewer input improves manuscript quality and strengthens the evidence base for oncology practice.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers should evaluate study design, statistical rigor, and clarity of conclusions. Feedback should be specific, respectful, and aimed at improving manuscript quality.

If ethical or integrity concerns are identified, reviewers should confidentially inform the editorial office.

Constructive reviews help authors improve clarity and strengthen the clinical value of their findings.

Comment on originality, methodology, and whether conclusions are supported by the data. Prioritize major issues first, then note secondary improvements.

Reviewers should avoid sharing manuscripts and should decline invitations when conflicts or time constraints prevent timely review.

Note whether abstracts and conclusions accurately reflect the data and suggest clarity improvements.

Provide recommendations on whether data and methods are sufficient for replication.

Please be concise when possible.

Conflict of Interest

Decline reviews when conflicts may affect objectivity.

Ethics

Flag concerns about consent, data integrity, or plagiarism.

Review Focus Areas

01

Scientific Quality

Evaluate methods, validity, and interpretation.

02

Reporting Clarity

Check whether findings are presented clearly.

03

Ethical Compliance

Confirm approvals and consent where required.

04

Data Integrity

Check that data and conclusions align without overstatement.

05

Constructive Detail

Provide specific suggestions that help authors improve the manuscript.

06

Confidentiality

Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscript content and review comments.

Review Timelines

Timely reviews support efficient publication decisions.

Rapid
Fast Track
1 Week
If urgent
Priority
Update
Extensions
By Request
If needed
Flexible

Review Best Practices

📋

Structured Feedback

Organize comments by major and minor issues.

🔍

Evidence Based

Tie recommendations to data and methodology.

💬

Professional Tone

Provide respectful, constructive critique.

🔒

Confidentiality

Do not share manuscripts or review details.

Peer Review Strengthens Science

High quality reviews improve manuscript rigor and advance chemotherapy research integrity. Thoughtful reviews also mentor authors and improve study reporting across the field while supporting consistent clinical translation and patient impact in oncology care. Timely reviews are appreciated by authors.

Reviewer Questions?

Contact the editorial office for guidance on review expectations.

[email protected]

Join Our Reviewer Panel

Support IJCP by contributing your expertise as a reviewer.